Vendor performance

How every feed is actually trending

Six months of feed health, enrichment completion and merchandise coverage — by vendor or across the whole book. Vendors can drop a sample file at the bottom and see exactly where they land.

Feed health

77%

+9 pts since Feb

Enrichment complete

73%

+11 pts since Feb

Merchandise coverage

66%

+12 pts since Feb

The commercial argument

We don't remove the ecommerce manager — we shrink the work per item

Veranda turns 30–45 minutes of repetitive preparation into roughly 5–10 minutes of review, and routes questionable records to a human instead of guessing. Save 25 minutes across 1,000 products and that is about 417 labor hours back in the year.

Across the vendor book

478

labor hours saved

Saved per item

30 min

Cleared without a human

82%

Routed to a reviewer

18%

956 products × 30 minutes saved ÷ 60 = 478 hours. The 18% that looks questionable still stops with a reason attached and waits for a person.

Feed health & enrichment over time

Percent of rows ingesting cleanly vs. fully enriched.

Merchandise coverage

Share of SKUs live on every intended channel.

SKUs under management vs. items held

Volume keeps climbing; held items stay the exception.

Vendor quality leaderboard

Quality score = 35% feed health + 35% enrichment completion + 30% merchandise coverage.

#VendorFeedFeed healthEnrichmentCoverageQuality
1Harborline WoodworksAPI webhook92%88%95%92
2Ridgeform Cast Co.EDI 83290%85%90%88
3Marisol WeavingCSV drop86%81%82%83
4Vallero CeramicaCSV drop73%69%61%68
5Northlight MetalworksManual portal44%40%0%29

Score your sample

Drop a CSV of 10–50 SKUs. We run the same intake rules and place you against the vendor book — no data is published from this check.

Paste or upload rows to see your score.